Knowledge Sources
Purpose
This document defines how humans identify, evaluate, and revise knowledge.
No civilization can remain stable if it cannot distinguish between reliable understanding and error.
Knowledge is not static. It must be continually tested, corrected, and contextualized.
This document establishes principles, not authorities.
Foundational Principle
No source is infallible.
All knowledge is provisional, conditional, and subject to revision when confronted with better evidence or clearer reasoning.
Trust in knowledge arises from method, not origin.
Categories of Knowledge Sources
Human knowledge emerges from multiple source types. Each has value and limitations.
1. Direct Observation
Direct observation includes:
- measurement
- experimentation
- repeated sensory evidence
- reproducible outcomes
This is the most reliable foundation of knowledge.
Observations gain strength when they are:
- independently verified
- repeatable
- transparent in method
2. Empirical Research
Empirical research builds on observation through structured inquiry.
Reliable research:
- documents methodology
- exposes assumptions
- allows replication
- reports uncertainty
Authority does not arise from credentials alone, but from openness to verification and correction.
3. Engineering and Practice
Practical application generates knowledge through use.
A method that:
- functions consistently
- produces predictable outcomes
- fails in understandable ways
contributes valid knowledge, even when theory is incomplete.
Practice reveals constraints theory may miss.
4. Historical Record
History provides insight into:
- human behavior
- systemic patterns
- long-term consequences
Historical knowledge is interpretive and must be treated carefully.
Records may be:
- incomplete
- biased
- context-dependent
Patterns matter more than narratives.
5. Cultural and Experiential Knowledge
Communities accumulate understanding through lived experience.
This includes:
- traditional practices
- generational memory
- localized adaptation
Such knowledge is valuable but must remain open to examination and integration with broader evidence.
Tradition explains what worked—not necessarily why.
6. Theoretical and Mathematical Models
Abstract reasoning allows humans to:
- explore possibilities
- test consistency
- extend understanding beyond direct observation
Models are tools, not truth.
Their validity depends on:
- assumptions
- boundary conditions
- empirical alignment
Evaluation Criteria
A knowledge source gains reliability when it demonstrates:
- transparency of method
- openness to critique
- consistency with observed reality
- capacity for prediction or explanation
- willingness to be revised or discarded
Claims that resist examination weaken collective understanding.
Revision and Correction
Correction is not failure.
It is the mechanism by which understanding improves.
Healthy knowledge systems:
- reward correction
- document change
- preserve past errors for learning
- resist permanent dogma
No idea is exempt from reevaluation.
Misuse of Knowledge
Knowledge becomes dangerous when it is:
- presented without context
- detached from consequence
- treated as immutable truth
- weaponized for control or manipulation
Information without responsibility erodes trust.
Education and Literacy
A core responsibility of education is teaching people how to:
- question sources
- recognize uncertainty
- differentiate evidence from assertion
- update beliefs responsibly
Knowledge literacy is a prerequisite for self-governance.
Closing Statement
Humanity advances not by clinging to certainty, but by maintaining disciplined humility.
Knowledge is not what is believed.
Knowledge is what survives contact with reality.